Customers

Legal teams that changed how they review contracts

From M&A boutiques to in-house legal managing 50-plus contracts per quarter, how practitioners use clause-level analysis to get to the real work faster.

Case studies

How legal teams use Clausebeam

Regional M&A boutique, 12 attorneys, Mid-Atlantic
4 days → 6 hrs
First-pass diligence on a 30-contract deal room
The problem
Deal rooms arriving with 20 to 40 contracts, junior associates spending the first four days on clause reads before partners could begin substantive review. Every deal started behind schedule, and the reads were inconsistent depending on which associate ran them.
Clausebeam turned our first-pass bottleneck into a starting point. Associates begin where they add value, on the clauses that are actually flagged. Partners see a structured risk memo in hours, not after a week of reads. The indemnification flags alone cut two negotiation cycles on our last deal.

Partner, Corporate M&A

In-house legal team at a healthcare technology company
Consistent baseline
Every vendor MSA reviewed to the same standard
The problem
50+ vendor contracts per quarter. Inconsistent review, some attorneys flagged certain clause patterns, others missed them. The GC wanted a repeatable baseline before contracts hit the negotiation table.
We know every MSA gets the same level of clause scrutiny now. Clausebeam is the consistent first pass, then attorneys review what the system flags. It raised our floor, not just our ceiling.

Senior Associate General Counsel

Corporate counsel group at a mid-size financial services firm
Liability cap flags
Actionable context on every deviation
The problem
Liability cap analysis was inconsistent across the team. Attorneys identified the cap multiple but did not always contextualize it against deal value or market norms for that agreement type. On high-volume cycles, some flags were missed entirely.
The liability cap analysis is genuinely useful. It's not just "here's an unusual clause", it tells you what the deviation is and why it matters for the deal. That context is what saves negotiation cycles.

Corporate Counsel

What practitioners say

We used Clausebeam on a 47-document deal room last quarter. Turnaround on the clause summary went from four days to an afternoon. The indemnity flags alone saved us two negotiating cycles.

Partner, Corporate M&A
Mid-size law firm, Mid-Atlantic

Our GC wanted a repeatable process for vendor contract review. Clausebeam gave us a consistent flagging baseline. We know every MSA gets the same level of clause scrutiny now.

Senior Associate General Counsel
Tech company, 800+ employees

The liability cap analysis is genuinely useful. It's not just "here's an unusual clause", it tells you what the deviation is and why it matters for the deal.

Corporate Counsel
Financial services firm

Start with one contract. See what Clausebeam finds.

Upload any commercial agreement and get a free clause-flag report. No credit card, no commitment.

Start free review Book a walkthrough